<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: States Set Low Bar for Student Achievement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://progressconservative.com/2009/12/30/report-states-set-low-bar-for-student-achievement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/12/30/report-states-set-low-bar-for-student-achievement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike at The Big Stick</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/12/30/report-states-set-low-bar-for-student-achievement/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike at The Big Stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressconservative.com/?p=4430#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right Z (and between you or me, it&#039;s the best way to fight off the Intelligent Design wackos).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right Z (and between you or me, it&#8217;s the best way to fight off the Intelligent Design wackos).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoughtcounts Z</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/12/30/report-states-set-low-bar-for-student-achievement/#comment-2872</link>
		<dc:creator>thoughtcounts Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressconservative.com/?p=4430#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right on with the &quot;core of basic knowledge&quot; angle. It&#039;s politically impossible to have a national curriculum with the same level of detail that local curricula currently have, but perhaps it&#039;d be possible to sell a kind of skeletal outline of what everybody should include. That ought to make it more palatable to the conservative ideology you mentioned, especially if you throw in the national security/outsourcing jobs/competitiveness aspect. We can&#039;t expect to have the highest technology, best cybersecurity, most innovation, etc. if our children can barely read or perform arithmetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right on with the &#8220;core of basic knowledge&#8221; angle. It&#8217;s politically impossible to have a national curriculum with the same level of detail that local curricula currently have, but perhaps it&#8217;d be possible to sell a kind of skeletal outline of what everybody should include. That ought to make it more palatable to the conservative ideology you mentioned, especially if you throw in the national security/outsourcing jobs/competitiveness aspect. We can&#8217;t expect to have the highest technology, best cybersecurity, most innovation, etc. if our children can barely read or perform arithmetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
