<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change of Tactics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://progressconservative.com/2009/06/30/change-of-tactics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/06/30/change-of-tactics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/06/30/change-of-tactics/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressconservative.com/?p=3605#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>No - I don&#039;t. I think there has to be a level of consistency in our foreign policy. A policy of caution and restraint, like he showed with Iran, is a good policy across the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8211; I don&#8217;t. I think there has to be a level of consistency in our foreign policy. A policy of caution and restraint, like he showed with Iran, is a good policy across the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACG</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/06/30/change-of-tactics/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>ACG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressconservative.com/?p=3605#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not following - do you agree with the Pres. for assessing the risks that way? I think you hit the nail on the head, as to why the reactions are different, and I don&#039;t see anything wrong with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not following &#8211; do you agree with the Pres. for assessing the risks that way? I think you hit the nail on the head, as to why the reactions are different, and I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
