<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the Vault: Assault Weapons and Gun Violence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicans and Gun Law &#124; Republicans United.</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Republicans and Gun Law &#124; Republicans United.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at RU, I am reposting this item from my own blog. I wrote about the problem of gun trafficking at The Big Sticklast year.  Republicans have a long history of generally being on the right side of law [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at RU, I am reposting this item from my own blog. I wrote about the problem of gun trafficking at The Big Sticklast year.  Republicans have a long history of generally being on the right side of law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaheen Lakhan</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaheen Lakhan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://brainblogger.com/2008/05/09/should-doctors-have-guns/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote on another issue of gun rights&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://brainblogger.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brain Blogger&lt;/a&gt;. Disgruntled or disturbed patients have come into physician offices and assaulted staff or physicians. This has led some doctors to store firearms in the workplace.

I would like to hear your comments on this issue on our site. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Shaheen

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recently <a href="http://brainblogger.com/2008/05/09/should-doctors-have-guns/" rel="nofollow">wrote on another issue of gun rights</a> at <a href="http://brainblogger.com" rel="nofollow">Brain Blogger</a>. Disgruntled or disturbed patients have come into physician offices and assaulted staff or physicians. This has led some doctors to store firearms in the workplace.</p>
<p>I would like to hear your comments on this issue on our site. Thank you.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Shaheen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Conservative</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Progressive Conservative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No apologies necessary. I completely understand your position on &#039;assault weapons&#039; vs. &#039;aasault rifles&#039;. As we both know, most of those promoting firearm restrictions don&#039;t actually know much about firearms. They tend to be in big cities and are a bit naive about the differences in various types of guns (I always love it when they talk about putting &#039;bullets&#039; in shotguns!) 

I think the biggest problem regarding &#039;assault weapons&#039; has been the proliferation of AK-47&#039;s in the U.S. They look scary, they sound scary and people associate them with all the bad guys in those old Chuck Norris movies. I was just watching &#039;DEA&#039; on television the other night and they talked about how these are now very popular with the drug crowd. But their fear is really the rounds they shoot and the possibility of after-market modifications that make them fully auto. Fortunately that only describes a small % of these guns. I&#039;m sure you have been to gun shows and seen hundreds of AK&#039;s that were completely benign and being touted as a decent semi-auto hunting rifle. 

As in most things political, you are 100% correct that terminology frames so much of the arguement. Conservatives have been good at this at times but on gun rights, we keep falling short.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No apologies necessary. I completely understand your position on &#8216;assault weapons&#8217; vs. &#8216;aasault rifles&#8217;. As we both know, most of those promoting firearm restrictions don&#8217;t actually know much about firearms. They tend to be in big cities and are a bit naive about the differences in various types of guns (I always love it when they talk about putting &#8216;bullets&#8217; in shotguns!) </p>
<p>I think the biggest problem regarding &#8216;assault weapons&#8217; has been the proliferation of AK-47&#8242;s in the U.S. They look scary, they sound scary and people associate them with all the bad guys in those old Chuck Norris movies. I was just watching &#8216;DEA&#8217; on television the other night and they talked about how these are now very popular with the drug crowd. But their fear is really the rounds they shoot and the possibility of after-market modifications that make them fully auto. Fortunately that only describes a small % of these guns. I&#8217;m sure you have been to gun shows and seen hundreds of AK&#8217;s that were completely benign and being touted as a decent semi-auto hunting rifle. </p>
<p>As in most things political, you are 100% correct that terminology frames so much of the arguement. Conservatives have been good at this at times but on gun rights, we keep falling short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rustmeister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason I ask is because I (and many gun enthusiasts) consider the term &quot;assault weapon&quot; to be a political term made up to confuse the general public. Many times, politicians, media types, etc., use the term &quot;assault weapon&quot; when what they really should be saying is &quot;assault rifle&quot;.

An assault rifle is what soldiers use. They can fire in full-auto or burst mode, and if made after 1986, are illegal for the general public to own. 

Those made before 1986 are controlled the same way any machine gun is - through the provisions of the National Firearms Act of 1936. 

In a nutshell, in order for a regular person to but a machine gun, they have to undergo a federal background check, get permission from their chief local law enforcement officer, pay a $200 tax, and then pony up the money to actually purchase the machine gun, which usually means $10,000 or more.

You&#039;re spot-on in regards to black rifles. They look cool, but are functionally no different than any other &quot;normal&quot; rifle. That&#039;s what everybody is talking about when they use the term &quot;assualt weapon&quot;.

They aren&#039;t talking about machine guns, they are talking about normal guns that look like military ones. But, they want us to think &quot;assault rifle&quot;, so we won&#039;t oppose banning them.

Sorry for rambling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I ask is because I (and many gun enthusiasts) consider the term &#8220;assault weapon&#8221; to be a political term made up to confuse the general public. Many times, politicians, media types, etc., use the term &#8220;assault weapon&#8221; when what they really should be saying is &#8220;assault rifle&#8221;.</p>
<p>An assault rifle is what soldiers use. They can fire in full-auto or burst mode, and if made after 1986, are illegal for the general public to own. </p>
<p>Those made before 1986 are controlled the same way any machine gun is &#8211; through the provisions of the National Firearms Act of 1936. </p>
<p>In a nutshell, in order for a regular person to but a machine gun, they have to undergo a federal background check, get permission from their chief local law enforcement officer, pay a $200 tax, and then pony up the money to actually purchase the machine gun, which usually means $10,000 or more.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re spot-on in regards to black rifles. They look cool, but are functionally no different than any other &#8220;normal&#8221; rifle. That&#8217;s what everybody is talking about when they use the term &#8220;assualt weapon&#8221;.</p>
<p>They aren&#8217;t talking about machine guns, they are talking about normal guns that look like military ones. But, they want us to think &#8220;assault rifle&#8221;, so we won&#8217;t oppose banning them.</p>
<p>Sorry for rambling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Conservative</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Progressive Conservative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty conservative on my definition. I only apply the &#039;assault weapon&#039; label to the rate-of-fire, i.e. &#039;full auto&#039;. As I&#039;m sure you know, there are plenty of rounds out there being used by both the military and by hunters. (Personally, I find the .223 round a little small for deer, but some people like it. ) The only thing separating these two groups is that hunters don&#039;t need to fire on full auto. Soldiers do. 

The so-called &#039;black rifles&#039; out there are certainly configured as &#039;assault weapons&#039; with a smaller frame, more lightweight, etc but I think that only muddy the waters. At the end of the day, they still have a semi-auto rate of fire and that makes them no more dangerous than your average hunting rifle. Yes, they are sometimes more easily concealed, but concealment isn&#039;t the problem. It&#039;s the lead coming out of them when they are un-concealed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty conservative on my definition. I only apply the &#8216;assault weapon&#8217; label to the rate-of-fire, i.e. &#8216;full auto&#8217;. As I&#8217;m sure you know, there are plenty of rounds out there being used by both the military and by hunters. (Personally, I find the .223 round a little small for deer, but some people like it. ) The only thing separating these two groups is that hunters don&#8217;t need to fire on full auto. Soldiers do. </p>
<p>The so-called &#8216;black rifles&#8217; out there are certainly configured as &#8216;assault weapons&#8217; with a smaller frame, more lightweight, etc but I think that only muddy the waters. At the end of the day, they still have a semi-auto rate of fire and that makes them no more dangerous than your average hunting rifle. Yes, they are sometimes more easily concealed, but concealment isn&#8217;t the problem. It&#8217;s the lead coming out of them when they are un-concealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2009/01/29/the-nra-and-assault-weapons/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rustmeister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My only question: How do you define &quot;assault weapon&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only question: How do you define &#8220;assault weapon&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

