
If nothing else, the choice of Sarah Palin as John McCain’s running mate has given the press and both political parties a lot to talk about. On the Right, the choice of Palin has energized the base and the word from Minnesota is that tonight promises to be a very lively audience for the four main speakers, culminating with Palin’s speech.
In the media, jounalists are scrambling to uncover anything they can about this politician, possibly to make up for being caught with their pants down on Friday morning.
The reaction on the Left has been most interesting to watch though. Our friend Ames has exceeded even his normal breakneck posting schedule to put out a volume of posts on Pain that I lost count of over the weekend. He seems to be operating under the strategy of saturation bombing and we will anxiously wait to see if it is effective.
As for the rest of the liberal crowd, reaction to Palin has been met with an interesting mix of attacks from a variety of angles. The tone of these attacks reached such a fever pitch that Obama himself had to step in and try to distance himself from the attackers yesterday.
One of our close friends and fellow centrists / moderates Dyre42 over at Dyre Portents offers his own spot-on analysis:
The result has been days of ad hominem attacks on both Palin and her family, rank condescension by the MSM, and a stream of vitriol on the left that is normally reserved only for W himself. In fact the treatment of her family became so bad that even Obama tried to reign it in.
I agree with Dyre that what we have seen is right up there with the stuff we normally see directed at the Great Satan, George W Bush. This speaks to a point I have tried to make in the past (here and here) which is that the Left was so energized with hatred heading into this election that anything short of a landslide may prove to be cause for riot. I think McCain’s military service has blunted the point of what would have been a very ugly general election if someone like Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney would have gotten the nod. With Palin though, it seems the Left was willing to try taking the gloves off. Dyre again offers his analysis of the effect:
A side effect of this has been that the base has circled the wagons around Palin and by extension McCain. Additionally I think the nonstop coverage of McCain’s decision to make Palin his second forced many independents to reevaluate their position on a McCain presidency.
I have spoken about this on other blogs’ comment sections. No matter how much liberals believe that Palin is the opposite of what women have been fighting for, the truth is that many women, especially baby boomers and older, are going to find it hard to go into a voting booth and pull the lever against a woman. I have already personally heard from several women who now say their decision is completely in the air again. This bodes well for the GOP.
I’d like to leave you with one last bit of speculation from Dyre. He may be reaching a bit in his theory, but I like it nonetheless. It would impress me to know McCain’s camp was thinking that far ahead.
But I can’t help but wonder if McCain’s campaign suspected that this would happen. By that I mean that by picking Palin they would bring out the worst that the left has to offer and therefore give them just enough rope to hang themselves.

11 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 3, 2008 at 5:34 pm
Dyre42
Its just a nagging unfounded suspicion that popped up when I was trying to figure out why McCain picked Palin over Jindal and Pawlenty.
September 3, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Ames
I haven’t seen any of the mainstream media indulging in ad hominem attacks on Palin. Daily Kos… btw… doesn’t count as mainstream
. And I disagree with your assessment that women voters will find it hard to vote against a woman; especially where Palin doesn’t speak for many women, and poll numbers show her doing worse among women than men.
September 3, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Ames
Dyre, your suspicion is right insofar as it was a naked ploy to use gender to peel away voters emotionally, without the issues ever coming up… McCain’s strategy this whole election has been to suborn issues to who’s more “likable.” I think McCain also intended picking a woman to immunize his campaign from allegations of sexism, to a certain degree, but I don’t think he expected the worst of the left to come out, nor do I think it has.
September 3, 2008 at 7:11 pm
Progressive Conservative
Ames, I just read an article this afternoon that says black attendance at the RNC convention is down 78% from 2004. This is the lowest number in 40 years. I think we all know why. So it is quite possible even today that people could vote based on identity politics.
There’s a lot of time between now and November.
September 3, 2008 at 8:36 pm
Ames
Good point – but I wouldn’t discount the effect of eight years of neglect of racial discrimination, in favor for the elusive and rare case of religious discrimination, by the Bush Justice Department. And Katrina. And, yes, Obama, but Obama shares values with most African Americans; Palin’s values diverge from a good deal of women.
PS – I didn’t know you liked Dr. Horrible! What a GREAT SHOW. Law school friend & I are going to the fall costume ball as Dr. Horrible & Captain Hammer.
September 3, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Progressive Conservative
I’d be curious to hear your take on what women’s values are. Maybe a post with some heavy input from Diddionsmommy?
And yes, i love Dr. Horrible. I’m a big fan of Neil patrick harris in ‘How I Met Your Mother’ and I heard about Dr.Horrible on NPR so I had to check it out.
September 4, 2008 at 11:25 am
John
I have to agree with Ames here … ok, I don’t *have* to, but what the hell. Bush’s administration had a black eye with the black community before Obama had even formed an exploratory committee. And help me out because I honestly can’t remember, but was McCain part of the no-MLK day contingent in Arizona, or did he buck the party on that one?
~ John
September 4, 2008 at 11:36 am
Progressive Conservative
I believe McCain opposed MLK.
As poor as Bush was with Katrina and despite other perceived failures, I find it hard to believe that more blacks dislike the GOP now than in 1970. It’s more about Obama than about the GOP.
September 4, 2008 at 7:21 pm
Progressive Traditionalist
Cool photo to lead into this post.
One of the best ever.
September 4, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Progressive Conservative
Thanks PT. For some reason, every time I heard the left criticize her this week I kept thinking ‘cat fight’. That photo was the best I could find. (You’d be amazed how much porn shows up when you google that).
September 24, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Radioactive afikomen
Being experienced netizens, I don’t think anyone has the right to say, “You’d be surprised how much porn comes up” when speaking of the internet. : )