<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Intelligence is So Important To Liberals This Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://progressconservative.com/2008/07/29/why-intelligence-is-so-important-to-liberals-this-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://progressconservative.com/2008/07/29/why-intelligence-is-so-important-to-liberals-this-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Conservative</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2008/07/29/why-intelligence-is-so-important-to-liberals-this-year/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Progressive Conservative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=381#comment-472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Elitism&lt;/i&gt; became a buzz word this year because the term was applied primarily to Obama (and to a lesser extent Hillary).

The &#039;defense&#039; of science undertaken primarily by atheists in the last few years has been a liberal movement reacting to the fundamentalism of Bush. As you yourself say, Democrats think they are putting up geniuses with their contendors, so there is a certain amount of partisan pride in elitism there as well. 

You can argue that the motivations of the group are purely non-partisan in nature, but there aren&#039;t too many readers who are going to swallow that.  While the Carnival has proved itself to be a strong collection of good writing, I think it&#039;s a little disingenious to contend there isn&#039;t an undercurrent throughout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Elitism</i> became a buzz word this year because the term was applied primarily to Obama (and to a lesser extent Hillary).</p>
<p>The &#8216;defense&#8217; of science undertaken primarily by atheists in the last few years has been a liberal movement reacting to the fundamentalism of Bush. As you yourself say, Democrats think they are putting up geniuses with their contendors, so there is a certain amount of partisan pride in elitism there as well. </p>
<p>You can argue that the motivations of the group are purely non-partisan in nature, but there aren&#8217;t too many readers who are going to swallow that.  While the Carnival has proved itself to be a strong collection of good writing, I think it&#8217;s a little disingenious to contend there isn&#8217;t an undercurrent throughout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoughtcounts Z</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2008/07/29/why-intelligence-is-so-important-to-liberals-this-year/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thoughtcounts Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=381#comment-468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you have it backwards. Democrats do care a lot about intelligence this year, but I don&#039;t think they&#039;re doing that in order to elect Obama. I think Obama and Clinton were the two front-runners for the Democratic nomination because they are both so intelligent. It&#039;s a reaction to what&#039;s seen as one of the worst aspects of Bush. Democrats are looking to run the anti-Bush candidate, and one clear way to be opposite Bush is to be an intellectual.

Also, I gotta say... it&#039;s starting to push a little into the conspiracy theory realm to argue that because a group is promoting a particular trait, and a political candidate happens to share that trait, the purpose of the group must be to help get that candidate elected. By that logic, Mormon missionaries were trying to convert people in order to help Romney&#039;s political career. Yes, those who care about intelligence tend to like intelligent politicians, but the caring about intelligence came first, and then the politicians. Intelligence is something worth promoting for its own sake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have it backwards. Democrats do care a lot about intelligence this year, but I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re doing that in order to elect Obama. I think Obama and Clinton were the two front-runners for the Democratic nomination because they are both so intelligent. It&#8217;s a reaction to what&#8217;s seen as one of the worst aspects of Bush. Democrats are looking to run the anti-Bush candidate, and one clear way to be opposite Bush is to be an intellectual.</p>
<p>Also, I gotta say&#8230; it&#8217;s starting to push a little into the conspiracy theory realm to argue that because a group is promoting a particular trait, and a political candidate happens to share that trait, the purpose of the group must be to help get that candidate elected. By that logic, Mormon missionaries were trying to convert people in order to help Romney&#8217;s political career. Yes, those who care about intelligence tend to like intelligent politicians, but the caring about intelligence came first, and then the politicians. Intelligence is something worth promoting for its own sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Adams</title>
		<link>http://progressconservative.com/2008/07/29/why-intelligence-is-so-important-to-liberals-this-year/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Adams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/?p=381#comment-460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You nailed it. The carnival is an extremely creative political tactic, but it is a political tactic nonetheless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it. The carnival is an extremely creative political tactic, but it is a political tactic nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

